Skip to content

Gravitational Wave Echoes and the Horizon Scale: A Comprehensive Review of Theoretical Models, Observational Constraints from O4, and Future Prospects

1. Introduction: The Asymptotic Silence and the Quantum Horizon

The detection of gravitational waves (GWs) by the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors in 2015 marked the cessation of the "silent era" of black hole physics and the commencement of the era of precision strong-field gravity. For decades, black holes were astrophysical ghosts, inferred only through their interactions with surrounding matter—accretion disks, X-ray binaries, and stellar orbits. The direct detection of the spacetime ringing generated by the merger of two black holes (BBHs) provided the first empirical evidence that these objects are not merely dense concentrations of mass, but dynamical entities composed of warped spacetime itself.

The signals observed to date, culminating in the high-precision detections of the Fourth Observing Run (O4) in 2024 and 2025, have been remarkably consistent with the predictions of General Relativity (GR).1 Specifically, the "ringdown" phase—the final stage of the merger where the distorted remnant settles into a stationary state—is well-described by a superposition of quasinormal modes (QNMs), damped sinusoids whose frequencies and decay times are uniquely determined by the mass and spin of the final object. This consistency supports the "no-hair" theorem and the presence of an event horizon, a one-way membrane from which no causal signal can escape.

However, the event horizon represents a profound conflict between the two pillars of modern physics: General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. The "Information Paradox," first articulated by Stephen Hawking in the 1970s, suggests that if a black hole evaporates via thermal Hawking radiation, the information about the state of the matter that formed it is irretrievably lost, violating the principle of unitary evolution in quantum mechanics.3 Theoretical attempts to resolve this paradox—ranging from String Theory's "fuzzballs" to the "firewall" hypothesis—suggest that the classical event horizon may be an approximation that breaks down at the quantum level. These theories posit the existence of "structure" at or near the horizon scale: a physical boundary, a transition to a new state of matter, or a quantum gravity regime that modifies the boundary conditions for spacetime perturbations.

If such a near-horizon structure exists, it has a direct observational consequence: "Gravitational Wave Echoes." In the standard GR picture, waves traveling inward during the ringdown disappear into the horizon. If the horizon is replaced by a reflective structure, these waves can be trapped between the structure and the angular momentum barrier (the photon sphere) located further out. This trapped energy would leak out periodically, producing a train of repeating pulses—echoes—following the main merger event.1

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the current state of gravitational wave echo research as of late 2025. It reviews the theoretical models of Exotic Compact Objects (ECOs) and Quantum Black Holes (QBHs) that predict echoes, including Gravastars, Fuzzballs, and the recently proposed Radial Coherential Dynamics (RCD). It critically assesses the observational status of echoes, analyzing the controversies of the O1/O2 era, the intriguing case of GW190521, and the implications of the high-SNR events from O4, particularly GW250114. Finally, it outlines the future prospects for detection with next-generation observatories like the Einstein Telescope and LISA.

2. Theoretical Framework of Echo Generation

The generation of gravitational wave echoes is fundamentally a problem of scattering in a modified potential well. To understand echoes, one must first understand the "cavity" created by deviations from the classical black hole geometry.

2.1 The Effective Potential and the Cavity Mechanism

In the framework of black hole perturbation theory, the dynamics of gravitational waves propagating on a background spacetime are governed by a master wave equation (e.g., the Regge-Wheeler or Teukolsky equation) of the form:

$$\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} + [\omega^2 - V(x)]\Psi \= 0$$

where $\Psi$ is the wave function, $\omega$ is the frequency, $V(x)$ is the effective potential, and $x$ is the "tortoise coordinate," which maps the semi-infinite radial range $r \in
Gravitational waves entering this cavity are reflected by the wall, travel outward to the potential barrier, and are partially transmitted to infinity and partially reflected back into the cavity. This repeated reflection and transmission generates a train of pulses—echoes—separated by a characteristic time delay $\Delta t_{echo}$.

2.2 Time Delays and the Logarithmic Sensitivity

A defining feature of gravitational wave echoes is the magnitude of the time delay. Due to the extreme gravitational redshift near the horizon, a microscopic coordinate distance $\epsilon$ translates to a macroscopic time delay for an observer at infinity. The delay is approximately the round-trip light-crossing time of the cavity:

$$\Delta t_{echo} \approx 2 \int_{r_{wall}}^{3M} \frac{dr}{1 - 2M/r} \approx 4M \ln\left(\frac{M}{\epsilon}\right)$$

For a solar-mass black hole, if the correction is at the Planck scale ($\epsilon \approx 10^{-35}$ m), the time delay is on the order of tens of milliseconds. This places the echo signal squarely within the sensitive frequency band of ground-based detectors like LIGO and Virgo. The logarithmic dependence $\ln(M/\epsilon)$ is critical; it means that gravitational wave astronomy can probe Planck-scale physics ($\epsilon \sim \ell_P$) using macroscopic objects. A correction that is orders of magnitude larger than the Planck length would only change the delay by a factor of order unity.1

2.3 The Dyson Series Formalism

The mathematical description of the echo waveform can be rigorously formulated using a Dyson series expansion. In this approach, the Green's function for the wave equation in the modified spacetime is expanded in terms of the "primary" Green's function (corresponding to the classical black hole) and interaction terms representing the reflections.7

The observable waveform $h(t)$ can be expressed as a superposition:

$$h(t) \= h_{GR}(t) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mathcal{K}_n * h_{echo}^{(n)}(t - n\Delta t)$$

where $h_{GR}(t)$ is the standard ringdown, and the summation represents the train of echoes. The operator $\mathcal{K}_n$ is a transfer function that encodes the frequency-dependent transmission through the photon sphere barrier and the reflection at the wall.
This formalism highlights two key distortions:

  1. Amplitude Decay: Each subsequent echo is fainter as energy leaks out of the cavity.
  2. Spectral Filtering: The potential barrier at the photon sphere acts as a high-pass filter for transmission (high-frequency modes escape easily) and a low-pass filter for reflection (low-frequency modes are trapped). Consequently, late-time echoes are not just quieter copies of the original signal; they are "redder," dominated by lower frequencies that are trapped more effectively in the cavity.8

2.4 Boltzmann Echoes: Stimulated Hawking Radiation

A more physically motivated phenomenological model, particularly relevant for "soft" quantum horizons (like fuzzballs), is the "Boltzmann echoes" framework. This model replaces the perfectly reflecting wall with a boundary condition governed by the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. The reflectivity $\mathcal{R}(\omega)$ is not unity but is frequency-dependent:

$$\mathcal{R}(\omega) \= \exp\left(-\frac{\hbar |\omega - m\Omega_H|}{2 k_B T_H}\right)$$

where $T_H$ is the Hawking temperature and $\Omega_H$ is the horizon angular velocity.
In this picture, the echoes are interpreted as stimulated Hawking radiation. The incoming gravitational waves from the merger excite the quantum degrees of freedom of the black hole microstructure. These excited states then decay, emitting radiation that is coherent with the incident wave but suppressed by the Boltzmann factor.10 This model predicts a specific spectral shape for the echoes, where high frequencies are exponentially suppressed, naturally explaining why "sharp" echoes might not be observed.

3. Taxonomy of Exotic Compact Objects (ECOs)

While the cavity mechanism is generic, the physical nature of the object determines the specific boundary conditions (reflectivity, phase shift, absorption). We distinguish between three primary classes of theoretical candidates: Gravastars, Fuzzballs, and models arising from Radial Coherential Dynamics.

3.1 Gravastars: The Hydrodynamic Alternative

The Gravastar (Gravitational Vacuum Star) was proposed by Mazur and Mottola as a solution to the singularity problem that respects classical energy conditions (mostly).

  • Physical Structure: A gravastar consists of a dark energy core (de Sitter space, $p \= -\rho$) surrounded by a thin shell of ultra-stiff matter ($p \= \rho$), which matches onto the external Schwarzschild vacuum. The "horizon" is effectively replaced by this physical shell.12
  • Echo Phenomenology: The matter shell of a gravastar acts as a "hard" boundary. It is distinct from the vacuum and possesses surface tension. Gravitational waves impinging on a gravastar induce quadrupolar oscillations of the shell. Theoretical modeling suggests that gravastars have a high reflectivity for gravitational waves, producing sharp, distinct echoes. The spectrum of a gravastar is characterized by discrete, evenly spaced resonant modes (cavity modes) that differ fundamentally from the QNM spectrum of a black hole.14
  • Distinguishability: The ringdown of a gravastar might initially mimic a black hole if the photon sphere lies outside the shell. However, the lack of an absorbing horizon means the signal does not decay exponentially forever but eventually reveals the cavity resonances. This stability and distinct "sound" (or spectrum) make gravastars potentially distinguishable from Kerr black holes, provided the echoes are loud enough.14

3.2 Fuzzballs: The Stringy Microstates

The Fuzzball paradigm arises from String Theory and offers a top-down resolution to the information paradox. It posits that the immense entropy of a black hole ($S_{BH} \= A/4$) counts the number of distinct, horizonless "microstate geometries."

  • Physical Structure: In the fuzzball picture, the fundamental strings and branes do not collapse to a singularity. Instead, they form a "ball of fuzz" that extends out to the horizon scale. There is no sharp horizon; the geometry ends in a transition to a high-dimensional topology with non-trivial fluxes.16
  • Echo Phenomenology: Fuzzballs are fundamentally "soft" or "absorptive" compared to gravastars. The incoming gravitational wave interacts with the massive number of internal degrees of freedom of the strings. While some coherent reflection is possible (leading to echoes), a significant fraction of the energy may be absorbed and thermalized, re-emitted later as incoherent Hawking radiation. This suggests that fuzzball echoes might be heavily damped or "washed out," making them harder to detect than gravastar echoes.18
  • Multipole Moments: A critical distinction of fuzzballs is that individual microstates break the symmetries of the Kerr metric. While a classical Kerr black hole's multipole moments ($M_\ell, S_\ell$) are locked to its mass and spin (the no-hair theorem), fuzzball microstates can have large, independent higher-order multipoles. This could manifest not just as echoes, but as subtle deviations in the inspiral waveform due to finite-size effects and quadrupole-monopole interactions.20

3.3 Radial Coherential Dynamics (RCD): A New Contender

Recent literature highlights a theoretical framework known as Radial Coherential Dynamics (RCD). This theory proposes a pre-geometric origin of spacetime, where the metric emerges from the decay of a "coherence field" $C(x)$.

  • Physical Structure: In RCD, the singularity is resolved by the saturation of the coherence field ($C \to 0$) in the deep interior. The theory predicts a "coherential horizon" that acts as a semi-transparent mirror. A key feature of RCD is the derivation of the reflection coefficient from first principles: $|\mathcal{R}|^2 \approx \alpha \approx 10^{-4}$, where $\alpha$ is a universal parameter derived from the ratio of Planck scale to coherence scale.22
  • Echo Phenomenology: RCD makes precise, falsifiable predictions. For a remnant similar to GW150914 (approx. 62 $M_\odot$), RCD predicts specific "orbital echoes" with a period of 3.84 ms, distinct from the radial cavity period predicted by simple models. The low predicted amplitude ($\sim 1\%$ of the primary signal) offers a natural explanation for why echoes have not yet been definitively detected: they are theoretically required to be faint.22
  • Cosmological Consistency: RCD is notable for claiming to resolve the Hubble tension (predicting a $\sim 9\%$ difference between early and late $H_0$ measurements) within the same framework that predicts black hole echoes, unifying cosmological and strong-gravity anomalies under a single coherence-decay mechanism.25

3.4 Boson Stars and Wormholes

  • Boson Stars: These are macroscopic Bose-Einstein condensates of scalar fields. Depending on the self-interaction of the boson, they can be compact enough to mimic black holes. However, unless they are ultra-compact ($R \< 3M$), they lack a photon sphere and do not produce sharp echoes. Their primary signature is often tidal deformability during the inspiral.27
  • Wormholes: Traversable wormholes possess two "mouths," creating a double potential barrier. This forms a very high-quality (high-Q) resonant cavity. Gravitational waves can be trapped between the two mouths, or leak through to the "other universe." Wormhole echoes are predicted to be potentially louder and longer-lived than other ECOs due to the efficiency of the double-barrier trap.29

4. The Observational Saga: From O1 to O4

The search for gravitational wave echoes has been a scientific rollercoaster, characterized by tentative detection claims, rigorous statistical rebuttals, and the continuous refinement of search pipelines.

4.1 The Early Claims and Controversies (O1/O2)

The field was galvanized in late 2016 by the study of Abedi, Dykaar, and Afshordi (ADA), who analyzed the public data from the first observing run (O1) of Advanced LIGO. Stacking data from the first three binary black hole events (GW150914, GW151226, LVT151012), they claimed to find tentative evidence for echoes with a significance of $2.5\sigma$ (p-value $\approx 0.01$).4 Their search used a phenomenological template based on a reflective wall at the Planck scale.

This claim triggered a contentious debate. Independent analyses by Westerweck et al. (representing the LIGO perspective) and others re-evaluated the statistical significance. They argued that the "look-elsewhere effect"—the statistical penalty for searching over a wide range of unknown parameters like echo period, phase, and damping—was underestimated in the ADA analysis. By using a larger set of background noise realizations (off-source data), Westerweck et al. found that the "signal" was consistent with detector noise glitches. They calculated p-values closer to 2-5%, which falls far short of the $5\sigma$ standard required for a discovery in physics.32

The ADA group responded that their priors were physically motivated (pinning the time delay to the Planck scale), which should reduce the look-elsewhere penalty. This debate highlighted the difficulty of searching for exotic signals in non-Gaussian detector noise and the heavy dependence of the results on the choice of priors.4

4.2 GW190521: The "Impossible" Black Hole and the Wormhole Hypothesis

The detection of GW190521 in O3 presented a unique opportunity. This event involved the merger of two massive black holes ($85 M_\odot$ and $66 M_\odot$), resulting in an intermediate-mass black hole remnant. The signal was extremely short (duration $\sim 0.1$ s) and lacked a clear inspiral phase, resembling a burst more than a chirp.

  • The Wormhole Echo Hypothesis: Several studies hypothesized that GW190521 might not be a binary merger at all, but rather a single, loud echo pulse from a pre-existing wormhole or a head-on collision of Proca stars. The lack of a precursor signal made it a prime candidate for such exotic interpretations. While Bayesian analysis showed the data was consistent with a wormhole echo, the standard precessing BBH model was slightly preferred.29
  • Evidence for Stimulated Emission: In a 2025 study, Abedi et al. applied the Boltzmann echo template to GW190521. They reported a Bayes Factor of $9.2$ in favor of the echo hypothesis over the pure noise hypothesis. This remains one of the strongest "pro-echo" results in the literature, suggesting that if echoes exist, they are best hunted in high-mass systems where the lower frequencies are less attenuated by the detector's seismic wall.10

4.3 Results from the O4 Observing Run (2023-2025)

The fourth observing run (O4), comprising O4a, O4b, and O4c, concluded in November 2025. It resulted in the detection of over 250 confirmed events, vastly expanding the catalog.2

4.3.1 GW250114: The Gold Standard

The defining moment of O4 was the detection of GW250114 on January 14, 2025. With a network signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of approximately 76, it is the loudest gravitational wave signal ever recorded.

  • Precision Tests: The extreme loudness allowed for "black hole spectroscopy" with unprecedented precision. Researchers identified the fundamental quadrupolar mode ($l=m=2$) and its first overtone in the ringdown. The frequencies and damping times were consistent with the Kerr metric to within a few percent.36
  • Area Theorem Validation: The high SNR allowed for independent measurements of the pre-merger and post-merger masses and spins. The LVK collaboration confirmed with $99.999\%$ confidence that the final horizon area was greater than the sum of the initial areas, validating Hawking's area theorem.38
  • Implications for Echoes: The "cleanness" of the GW250114 ringdown places severe constraints on echo models. If the horizon were a highly reflective surface (like a simple gravastar model), residuals would likely have been visible in such a high-SNR event. The absence of obvious deviations suggests that if echoes exist, their amplitude must be significantly suppressed (likely $A_{echo}/A_{peak} \lesssim 10\%$) or their time delays must be distinct from simple models.40

4.3.2 Population Studies and Null Results

Broader searches across the combined GWTC-1, GWTC-2, GWTC-3, and O4 catalogs have generally yielded null results. Recent comprehensive papers (e.g., Abedi 2025, "Search for echoes on the edge of quantum black holes") report that while individual events like GW190521 show hints, the combined Bayesian evidence across the population does not statistically favor the existence of echoes. The Bayes Factors for a "universal echo amplitude" hypothesis hover around 0.3–1.6, which is inconclusive but leans toward non-detection.11

4.3.3 Second-Generation Mergers

O4 detected compelling candidates for "second-generation" mergers—black holes formed from previous mergers—such as GW241011 and GW241110. These objects have high spins and unusual masses. They represent a new frontier for testing ECOs, as hierarchical formation might amplify certain non-GR effects (e.g., "hair" accumulation in fuzzball models). However, standard GR templates continue to provide excellent fits to these events as well.42

5. Comparative Analysis of Data vs. Models

The observational landscape of late 2025 offers critical insights into the validity of the theoretical models discussed in Section 3.

Feature Classical Black Hole Gravastar Fuzzball RCD Object Observational Status (O4)
Horizon Event Horizon Physical Shell Microstate Transition Coherential Horizon Consistent with Event Horizon (Area Theorem Confirmed)
Echo Reflectivity 0 (Perfect Absorption) High ($\sim 1$) Low (Boltzmann suppressed) Low ($\sim 10^{-4}$ power) Data disfavors High Reflectivity. Compatible with Low/Null.
Spectrum Isospectral QNMs Non-isospectral Cavity Modes Complex/Thermalized Orbital Echoes Consistent with Isospectral QNMs (GW250114)
Late-time Signal Exponential Decay Distinct Repeating Pulses Colored Noise / Faint Echoes Faint Echoes (1% amp) No distinct pulses detected above noise floor.

Insight 1: The "Hard Wall" is Dead. The non-detection of echoes in GW250114 essentially rules out simple "hard wall" models where the horizon is replaced by a perfect mirror at the Planck scale. If such objects existed, the loud ringdown of GW250114 would have produced unmistakable secondary pulses. The survival of ECO models now depends on mechanisms that suppress reflectivity, such as the Boltzmann factor in fuzzballs or the $\alpha$ suppression in RCD.

Insight 2: Degeneracy in High-Mass Events. The ambiguity of GW190521 (Binary vs. Wormhole) highlights a fundamental degeneracy. Short, burst-like signals from high-mass mergers can mimic the single-pulse echo of a wormhole. Breaking this degeneracy requires detecting the inspiral phase clearly, which was not possible for GW190521 due to its high mass and the detectors' low-frequency seismic noise limit.

Insight 3: The Viability of RCD. The RCD framework is emerging as a theoretically attractive alternative because it predicts the difficulty of detection. By deriving a reflectivity of $|\mathcal{R}|^2 \sim 10^{-4}$ from fundamental principles, it naturally explains why O1-O4 searches have found null results (the signal is buried in noise) while maintaining that the horizon is structured. Its falsifiability lies in the accumulation of high-SNR events where a $1\%$ signal might eventually emerge from the noise floor.22

The search for echoes has evolved from simple "bump hunting" to sophisticated statistical inference.

6.1 Template-Based Matched Filtering

This method, used by the ADA group, assumes a specific waveform shape (e.g., a train of damped sine-Gaussians).

  • Advantage: Highest sensitivity if the model is correct.
  • Disadvantage: Highly brittle. If the physical echo differs slightly (e.g., phase inversion, spectral distortion) from the template, the search sensitivity collapses. This likely contributed to the discrepancies between different groups analyzing O1 data.44

6.2 Morphology-Independent Searches

Methods like the "coherent WaveBurst" (cWB) or the "spectral comb" search look for excess power or periodic structures without assuming a specific pulse shape.

  • Spectral Combs: This technique looks for resonance peaks in the frequency domain ($f_n \approx n / \Delta t$). It is robust against pulse distortion because it relies only on the periodicity of the cavity, not the shape of the echo. Recent applications of this method to O3 data have yielded null results, reinforcing the constraints on high-reflectivity models.45

6.3 Bayesian Model Selection

The current gold standard is Bayesian inference, calculating the Bayes Factor ($\mathcal{B}$) between the "Signal + Echo" hypothesis and the "Signal + Noise" hypothesis. This method rigorously accounts for the "look-elsewhere" penalty by integrating over the prior parameter space. The fact that $\mathcal{B}$ remains close to 1 for most events indicates that the data is not yet informative enough to strictly rule out faint echoes, nor to claim detection.11

7. Future Prospects: The Road to 3G

The search for echoes is currently limited by detector sensitivity, particularly at high frequencies where the early echoes (containing the most energy) are located.

7.1 LIGO A+ and O5 (Late 2027)

The upcoming O5 run will feature the A+ upgrade, reducing quantum noise via frequency-dependent squeezing. This will improve sensitivity by a factor of \~2 over O4. While this might not be enough to detect "fuzzball" echoes (which might be incredibly faint), it will decisively test RCD predictions (1% amplitude) in high-SNR events.46

7.2 LISA (2030s)

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will detect supermassive black hole mergers.

  • Advantage: The timescales for these mergers are minutes to hours, not milliseconds. LISA will track the phase of the ringdown with exquisite precision ($SNR > 1000$).
  • Physics: LISA will map the spacetime potential around the hole. Even extremely low reflectivities will produce phase shifts in the long-duration signal that LISA can detect. This will be the ultimate test for "soft" ECOs like fuzzballs.6

7.3 Einstein Telescope (ET) and Cosmic Explorer (CE)

These third-generation (3G) ground-based detectors will represent a quantum leap.

  • Sensitivity: With arms 10km (ET) to 40km (CE) long, they will detect stellar-mass mergers with SNRs in the thousands.
  • Stacking: They will detect effectively every binary merger in the universe. This allows for "stacking" analyses of thousands of events, potentially digging out echo signals that are individually indistinguishable from noise.
  • Sub-Solar Mass Objects: They will also search for sub-solar mass compact objects. Detecting a $0.5 M_\odot$ black hole would be smoking gun evidence for Primordial Black Holes or ECOs, as stellar evolution cannot produce black holes that light.47

8. Conclusion

The search for gravitational wave echoes has matured from a controversial hunt for "bumps in the night" to a precision science constraining the fundamental properties of spacetime. The data from LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's O4 run, highlighted by the landmark event GW250114, has reinforced the classical description of black holes to an unprecedented degree. The area theorem holds; the spectroscopy matches Kerr; the horizon appears dark.

Yet, the theoretical motivation for echoes remains undiminished. The information paradox persists, and models like Fuzzballs and Radial Coherential Dynamics offer mathematically consistent, horizonless alternatives. The lesson from O4 is not that these theories are wrong, but that the deviations they predict are subtle. The horizon is not a brick wall; if it has structure, it is a "soft," absorbing, quantum structure that whispers rather than shouts.

As we look toward O5 and the third-generation detectors, the search shifts focus: from looking for loud echoes that would disprove GR instantly, to hunting for the faint, spectral fingerprints of quantum gravity hidden in the noise floor of the spacetime fabric. The horizon remains the most challenging frontier in physics, and gravitational wave echoes remain our best hope of crossing it.

Works cited

  1. Gravitational wave echos from physical black holes - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2510.11518v1
  2. News | LIGO – Virgo – KAGRA Complete Fourth Observing Run | LIGO Lab | Caltech, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20251118
  3. Copenhagen Survey on Black Holes and Fundamental Physics - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.15776v1
  4. Black Hole Echoes Would Reveal Break With Einstein's Theory - Quanta Magazine, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.quantamagazine.org/black-hole-echoes-would-reveal-break-with-einsteins-theory-20180322/
  5. Echoes from beyond: detecting gravitational-wave quantum imprints with LISA - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2411.05645v2
  6. Characterization of echoes: A Dyson-series representation of ..., accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07735
  7. [1706.06155] A recipe for echoes from exotic compact objects - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.06155
  8. Echoes of ECOs: gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact ..., accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08637
  9. Search for echoes on the edge of quantum black holes - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.00025
  10. Search for echoes on the edge of quantum black holes | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395071692_Search_for_echoes_on_the_edge_of_quantum_black_holes
  11. Gravastar - Wikipedia, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravastar
  12. Observational imprints of gravastars from accretion disks and hot-spots - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2401.07766v2
  13. (PDF) How to tell a gravastar from a black hole - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1893888_How_to_tell_a_gravastar_from_a_black_hole
  14. Did LIGO detect black holes or gravastars? - EurekAlert!, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/863571
  15. Fuzzball (string theory) - Wikipedia, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzball_(string_theory)
  16. PoS(Modave2021)003 - SISSA, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://pos.sissa.it/404/003/pdf
  17. How does a dark compact object ringdown? - the University of Groningen research portal, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://research.rug.nl/files/575169089/PhysRevD.102.064053.pdf
  18. Near-horizon matter field of fuzzball solution from paper [95]. Shown... - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Near-horizon-matter-field-of-fuzzball-solution-from-paper-95-Shown-in-the-figure_fig2_339833654
  19. [2007.01743] Distinguishing fuzzballs from black holes through their multipolar structure, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01743
  20. Distinguishing Fuzzballs from Black Holes through Their Multipolar Structure, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://repo.scoap3.org/api/files/ffb6d168-9793-4346-8fb2-2264144b3855/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.221601.pdf
  21. (PDF) RCD v26.1 -Gravitational Wave Echoes Radial Rupture and Gravitational Wave Echoes: Falsifiable Predictions from Coherential Dynamics - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398436251_RCD_v261_-Gravitational_Wave_Echoes_Radial_Rupture_and_Gravitational_Wave_Echoes_Falsifiable_Predictions_from_Coherential_Dynamics
  22. (PDF) Radial Coherential Dynamics v2.1: Complete Theoretical Framework From Primordial Coherence to Emergent Spacetime - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397941911_Radial_Coherential_Dynamics_v21_Complete_Theoretical_Framework_From_Primordial_Coherence_to_Emergent_Spacetime
  23. Radial Coherential Dynamics v2.4.1 Black Holes Without Singularities - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397942098_Radial_Coherential_Dynamics_v241_Black_Holes_Without_Singularities
  24. (PDF) Coherential Cosmology Radial Coherential Dynamics v18.0 - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398320440_Coherential_Cosmology_Radial_Coherential_Dynamics_v180
  25. Radial Coherential Dynamics v2.9 Complete Predictive Framework with Derivations, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397973563_Radial_Coherential_Dynamics_v29_Complete_Predictive_Framework_with_Derivations
  26. On the Identification of Exotic Compact Binaries with Gravitational Waves: a Phenomenological approach - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2505.16380v1
  27. Gravitational-wave data analysis with high-precision numerical relativity simulations of boson star mergers - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2406.02715v1
  28. Is GW190521 a gravitational wave echo of wormhole ... - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07831
  29. Spacetime depiction of gravitational wave echoes from a membrane/firewall on the stretched horizon, following a black hole merger event. - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Spacetime-depiction-of-gravitational-wave-echoes-from-a-membrane-firewall-on-the_fig1_311299603
  30. [1612.00266] Echoes from the Abyss: Tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00266
  31. [1712.09966] Low significance of evidence for black hole echoes in gravitational wave data, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09966
  32. [1612.05625] Comments on: "Echoes from the abyss: Evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons" - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05625
  33. [1803.08565] Comment on: "Low significance of evidence for black hole echoes in gravitational wave data" - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08565
  34. LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration successfully wraps up its fourth Observing Run, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.aei.mpg.de/1340755/ligo-virgo-kagra-collaboration-successfully-wraps-up-its-fourth-observing-run
  35. Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114 - LIGO DCC, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0201/P2500461/007/paper.pdf
  36. Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114 - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2509.08099v1
  37. Ten years after the discovery, gravitational waves verify Stephen Hawking's Black Hole Area Theorem | EurekAlert!, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1097682
  38. Ten years after the first gravitational wave: Hawking was right - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://vu.nl/en/news/2025/ten-years-after-the-first-gravitational-wave-hawking-was-right
  39. Scientists Finally Hear Black Holes Ring, Confirming Hawking's Famous Prediction, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-finally-hear-black-holes-ring-confirming-hawkings-famous-prediction/
  40. Searching for gravitational wave echoes from black hole binary events in the third observing run of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA collaborations | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375732220_Searching_for_gravitational_wave_echoes_from_black_hole_binary_events_in_the_third_observing_run_of_LIGO_Virgo_and_KAGRA_collaborations
  41. LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA observed “second generation” black holes for the first time - EGO, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.ego-gw.it/blog/2025/10/28/ligo-virgo-and-kagra-observed-second-generation-black-holes-for-the-first-time/
  42. LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA observe 'second generation' black holes for the first time - INFN, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.infn.it/en/ligo-virgo-and-kagra-observe-second-generation-black-holes-for-the-first-time/
  43. Searching for echoes of gravitational waves from coalescences of exotic compact objects - LIGO DCC, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0143/T1700322/001/Rico_SURF17_interim_report_%231_v2.pdf
  44. [2108.01820] Gravitational wave echoes search with combs - arXiv, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01820
  45. News | GWTC-4.0: Updated Gravitational-Wave Catalog Released - LIGO, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20250826
  46. Cosmic Explorer, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://cosmicexplorer.org/
  47. Search for Sub-Solar Mass Binaries with Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer - PMC - NIH, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8870920/